We hope you were able to watch the LOGO TV Democratic Candidate forum. If you missed them, check it out here.The format was so GAY!
It had the feel of a television talk show -- with a Merv Griffin-esque set -- very chic and stylish.
Each candidate entered the studio to a musical refrain with a dance-club kind of beat. One at a time, they walked passed the well-dressed, mostly white and mostly young audience and made their way to the stage where they were seated in an over-stuffed chair.
Obama, Edwards and Clinton -- AKA the "front runners" -- seemed the most comfortable seated there. Perhaps they are more relaxed in general, or maybe they are just good at acting -- which may be why they are the front runners in the first place!
The questions were surprisingly good with Melissa Etheridge asking the best, most heartfelt questions.
All in all, the forum was a success in bringing out the candidates stance on the issues, which boil down to this:
- Each of them supports State and Federal legal protections for same-sex couples
- They all want to repeal Don't Ask, Don't Tell
- Every one of them agree that we need more funding for AIDS education
- Only two -- Kucinich and Gravel -- support full marriage equality
Hillary lectured us on why her husband -- who let the LGBTQ Community down in so many ways -- was actually our champion because he prevented the Gingrich Republicans from inflicting even more harm to our families. In Hillary's view, DADT and DOMA were the solution to even harsher policies being pushed by right wing-nuts.
Maybe she's right. Thats how the game is played in Washington. LGBTQ people are/were used by both parties as political pawns to divide the country into mean-spirited factions who make a big stink over non-issues while the power brokers rape and pillage the economy and the military industrial complex wages an endless war and builds an unstoppable empire.
But hey, that just our opinion.
We are going to support Kucinich even though we are completely aware that he has a snowball's chance in hell of winning. But why should we support any other candidate when they do not fully support US? It seems like anything else would be a form of self-abuse.
Not that any of it matters anyway. We are skeptical about whether the election process and democracy even function any more.
The voting machines are hackable, the media is owned and controlled by big corporations, the Republicans, led by Rove, have reconfigured the justice department and have gerrymandered the voting district lines so that Republicans always have an edge.
But what gives us hope is the understanding that although the cards were stacked against the Democrats in November 2006, the people's will was stronger than the Republican machine.
Unfortunately, the stage is now set for Bush to suspend the elections in the event of a "national emergency" of his own making.
So, if there ARE elections and any one of the Democratic candidates are able to get elected, they ALL say they will fight for our rights to have a semblance of legal equality -- which is more than we can say for the Republicans.
The Dems -- they all talk the talk, but will they walk the walk?
We shall see...


