George Bush's “war on terror” has provided a pretext to transform the American republic into a new form of police state. Despite the Founding Father's carefully construed "checks and balances," Bush has granted himself unprecedented and unconstitutional executive powers.These broad powers allow Bush to make unilateral decisions and take sweeping action without any input or oversight from Congress. And, Bush's use of his dictatorial powers have shown no regard for the rights of American citizens.
One of the most egregious powers Bush created for himself is the power to spy on American citizens without a warrant. In the name of fighting the never ending "war on terror," Bush and his criminal accomplices have claimed that the Constitution's guarantee of due process (no search and/or seizure without a court order) is too dangerous.
Of course Bush would not have been able to destroy rights and liberties if Congress acted like the co-equal branch of Government that they are supposed to be.
The Democrats are especially despicable because they are armed with the authority of oversight and reign in Bush's power-grab.
But they did not try then and are still capitulating to the President, even as they claim that the "compromise" is a legislative success for the Democrats.
Did you ever wonder why the Dems keep caving to Bush? Call us paranoid, but we are not alone in suspecting that there is plenty of guilt to go around if an investigation should ever uncover the truth about the Bush crime family. And then there is also a matter of money. The Dems who signed on to the "compromise" have benefited the most from the generosity of the telecom industry.
There is hope though that the filibuster planned by Senators Dodd and Feingold will further delay the bills passage. If you care to let your own Senators know how you feel about FISA and telecom immunity, click here to send them an email.
I a joint statement released on Tuesday, the Senators said:
“This is a deeply flawed bill, which does nothing more than offer retroactive immunity by another name. We strongly urge our colleagues to reject this so-called ‘compromise’ legislation and oppose any efforts to consider this bill in its current form. We will oppose efforts to end debate on this bill as long as it provides retroactive immunity for the telecommunications companies that may have participated in the President’s warrantless wiretapping program, and as long as it fails to protect the privacy of law-abiding Americans.”Question is, what will you and I do about it?


